Hey Crush Crush Wiki! I'm Surafbrov, the new wiki manager for this Wiki, taking over since Thatawesomecat's departure. If you happen to need any help, don't hesitate to ask on my message wall or talk page!

Hello Crush Crush Wiki, I'm Thatawesomecat, your Wiki Manager here! I'll be acting as a liaison between you and Fandom Staff. For any questions or issues related to editing here, please feel free to reach out to me!

You can read more about Fandom Wiki Managers here: https://community.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:MisterWoodhouse/Introducing_the_Fandom_Wiki_Managers_and_Content_Team

I will be around to check your Recent Changes occasionally, but if you need me, please feel free to send me a message on my talk page. I look forward to working with you!

Hi all, just wanted to let you know that my role as WM with Fandom is over 6th March. If there is anything I can do for this community beforehand, please reach out during this time.

Best of luck with the wiki and to its community in the future!

I noticed some inconsistency in the girls' pages with the Friendzone(d) relationship level.  On some pages, the section is called Friendzone, while on others it is called Friendzoned.  The inconsistency also applies to the requirements tables.  I made a tally, and as of right now, with Peanut's sections and table just added, the breakdown is:

9 pages have Friendzoned sections 22 pages have Friendzone sections

24 pages have Friendzoned on the requirements table 7 pages have Friendzone on the requirements table.

About half of the pages have different names in the two places.  I am strongly of the opinion that these inconsistencies should be ironed out, but since it's pretty evenly split right now, I'd like to see if there are any strong opinions for the consistent term to be Friendzone or Friendzoned.

There is a Best Practices blog on how to engage readers.  We're already doing some of the things they recommend, but there may be other things that could improve the way we present the material here.

Since this wiki is expanding to encompass all Sad Panda Studios games, a rebranding of the wiki is in order. Keep in mind, the name you are voting for is what the new URL will look like:

[poll option].fandom.com

(Options listed alphabetically)

Why?

It has been bothering me for a while now that the welcome message has a broken link to our formatting guidelines.  The link isn't the problem as much as the lack of direction, and the resulting lack of consistency in how various pages look.  So I'm opening this thread, hoping to get some feedback.

Each girl's page

To get the ball rolling, I have a sample "blank girl page" in my sandbox.  Some notes:

• Some girls' pages have their quotes in italics, some don't, and some are a mix of both.  This is a horrible state.  Do you think their quotes should be in italics or no?
• Many sections of quotes repeat. There are a few possible ways to deal with this:
  1. List everything everywhere. This is the current approach that is (mostly) taken here.
  2. List once and refer the reader back via something like "Same as Nuisance". This reduces the vertical scrolling if you are going past that section, but sends you scrolling once again if that's the section you want to see.
  3. List everything in a template that gets used multiple times. This would mean adding/editing quotes can be done once and apply to multiple sections, but comes at the cost of being harder for newer editors to figure out how to contribute. If this option is chosen, a template naming convention would be a good idea, too.
  4. Same as #1 or #3, but using mw-collapsible classes to automatically hide the repetitions. The Show/Hide buttons can be edited (see the moist example in my sandbox) to say something like "Same as Nuisance" to inform the reader of what they will see when they expand. The drawback is that mw-collapsible doesn't work on mobile devices, according to Fandom documentation.
  5. Some kind of tabber-based approach? I'm not quite sure how this would work, but I'll play around with this idea in my sandbox.

Images

I am a strong believer in the idea that you should be able to have an idea of what a picture is about just by looking at its name. Or file name, as the case may be. So file names like "Screenshot 271" and file names that look like button mash soup should be avoided. When editing in source code mode, predictable and informative image file names makes things much simpler. So the formatting guidelines page should say something about how to name files.

There is some guidance for images on the Rules page:

I would suggest only one exception to the "all png" rule: if art files are released by the Sad Pandas, the exact file released will be the highest quality possible, even if it is in a lossy format like jpg. If we use such a file, it should be noted on the page for the file that it is an official image (and correctly attributed, of course). Official files in png format should be correctly attributed, too, naturally.

High traffic pages

Pages like Girls, Jobs, and Memory Album get a lot of traffic. So until there is consensus on explicitly what the formatting guidelines should be, I think these pages are a good starting point for implicitly what that formatting guidelines should be. To a certain extent, creating the formatting guidelines page will probably be reverse engineering what's happening on these pages.

Conclusion

I really think consistent formatting will help make this wiki easier to navigate - both between pages and within a page. I have some ideas and opinions about how we can get there and what it should look like, but I'd like to know if anyone else has different ideas or opinions. I can't even count how many times I've looked at the formatting other people have come up with here and thought, "That's way better than what I would have come up with," so comments and suggestions are encouraged.

Hello all, I'm The Embraced One or TEO, and I'm the Fandom Wiki Manager for this Wiki.

You can read more about Fandom Wiki Managers here

I'm here to act as a liaison between you and Fandom Staff and help you and your community. If you ever have any questions or issues related to the Wiki, its features (editing, templates, layouts, etc.), or anything else, feel free to reach out to me on my message wall and I will be happy to help out!

I don't know where to put this so I'll just put it here because it's related to the wiki

As most of us know, Sad Panda Studios (creators of the game) is making 3 games: Blush Blush, Hush Hush and Kitty Catsonova. While obviously we should add Hush Hush information to the wiki since it's the same girls and all, should we add information of the spin-off games to the wiki? I mean I can understand if we can leave out Kitty Catsonova since it's only relation to Crush Crush is being it having the same creators and having a cameo from lil Quill but Blush Blush is in the universe as Crush Crush which the creators basically confirmed in a stream of someone playing Blush Blush even as far to saying that a character in the game (I forgot his name) is the BROTHER of Iro.

In Short: Should we add information about the spin-off games?

Source for Iro's brother in Blush Blush: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HDMC2Cl7Huw&t=2776s    Time: 36:58

Edit: changed the title to better suit the discussion

So, I’ve been thinking about this for a while now, but this wiki really needs an admin. There are so many things that can only be done by admins that, in my opinion, help the wiki tremendously. For example, the color scheme could…well, it could use some work. As well as getting a better background image, and an custom icon.

Not only that, but also there are many pages marked for deletion and images that break wiki policies.

I’m willing to volunteer for admin as I have experience at this, but of course I haven’t been contributing for very long yet.
I’ll keep working on implanting the tables I made for the Jobs page on all other pages with tables either way, but it would be nice to get feedback so it could be decided who would be the best choice for an admin (Admin requirements).

I'm having trouble putting it on the front page. It always takes everything on the right column and drags it into the left. I'm wondering if anyone can help me make Template:Featured functional without making it do that.

So I can apply it to this wiki.

Hiya! So I've used this wiki a lot & it's really helped, I've even edited a page or two (Some proofreading & also fixed the jobs page when it got vandalised the other day, half of them got randomly deleted)

I'd like to talk about the formatting & layout of the girl's pages, and propose they be changed. As it is, if I want to find the girl's requirements tables for relationship stages, I have to scroll past the wall of text that is their entire dialogue. After checking a few girls & forgetting the requirements & checking again etc, this becomes somehwat tedious... Surely I'm not the only one who feels this way?

I propose for ease of use, for quick & easy access to the vital info, that the tables be placed before the dialogue. I thought it best to post here and ask before just going ahead and doing it & upsetting people lol

Let me know what you think :)